Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Original file (NR0322 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NRO0322-14
26 March 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Su

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1160 Ser 811/060

of 20 Feb 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide
advancement examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and
George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the availablie evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office

having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorabie action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ET1 from the September
2012 Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of 16
June 2013 with a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2013.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Amt [

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMER
Recorder Acting Recorder
5 Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

TTR eB. CaS ormnm

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

26 March 2014

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13

    Original file (NR8640 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3145 14

    Original file (NR3145 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MN1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13

    Original file (NR9380 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1089 14

    Original file (NR1089 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/EN3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR614 14

    Original file (NR614 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to LS1/E6 from the August 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2740 14

    Original file (NR2740 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14

    Original file (NR0500 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1177 14

    Original file (NR1177 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he had one additional award point that should have been added to the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3535 14

    Original file (NR3535 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWF1 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination due to two missing award points. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13

    Original file (NR9104 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...